male birth control: annoyed, intrigued
Dec. 4th, 2007 09:39 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
So I somehow clicked a link about male birth control option that are in the pipeline and have been reading about them for a half hour or so. It sounds like they're actually getting pretty close to getting something on the market. I have a few thoughts I want to bounce around with you vag-lovers though! (I suppose this is only particularly relevant to fertile female-bodied folks who have sex with male bodies, sorry to be exclusive.)
Under the cut is an article about a drug that sounds pretty promising. They're taking this drug, binding it to a modified form of Follicle Stimulating Hormone to increase the bioavailability at specific receptor sites, to temporarily eliminate men's virility. It keeps sperm from maturing all the way--and that's about it. Binded to the hormone, they don't need a very high dose, which eliminates side effects. All it does is make the sperm unviable. Sounds good, huh? Especially compared to female hormonal birth control, which, as many of us know, causes a lot of side effects.
But my question is, will men take to it? I read another article that said male contraceptive methods are pointless because (a) it's impossible to expect men to be responsible enough to take a medication regularly, and (b) there's no way men will ever want to take a pill that reduces their virility.
That really irked me. I mean, I don't want to be the feminist who cried sexist, but isn't it pretty short-sighted to say that we can't hold men to do these things when women are expected to do them everyday--with the added burden of terrible side effects? I don't know many women who actually like altering their bodies' natural processes and rendering themselves infertile, but many of us do it.
There are a few things from the article that seem to express a similar underlying bigoted outlook. (I bolded them in the article.) The doctor/researcher interviewed in the article said several things that hint that there's a double standard when it comes to birth control: the medical community and the world at large don't seem to care that hormonal b.c. is inconvenient and unpleasant for women, but they wouldn't dare try to use the same treatments on men if they altered the role of hormones in their body. As if meddling with women's hormonal balance doesn't cause "problematic side effects"!
I thought it was very odd that the article says that injection is unacceptable when many women take Depo Provera injections every three months! (Then again it might be different since this drug has been tested with intravenous injections rather than subdermal or muscular injections.)
So what do you think? Should we hold the same expectations for men that many people do for women--to take an active role in preventing pregnancy and bearing some of the (maybe event unpleasant!) burden of that responsibility? Are men capable of this? Are you excited at the prospect of male contraceptives? Do you think the attitudes I described are sexist or fair? Is the lack of faith in men's ability to deal with birth control realistic?
Personally I am sort of hopeful because maybe if a really good male contraceptive option (that causes few side effects) becomes available, it will eliminate problems for heterosexually active males and females. Which would be great!
( male birth control article HERE )
Under the cut is an article about a drug that sounds pretty promising. They're taking this drug, binding it to a modified form of Follicle Stimulating Hormone to increase the bioavailability at specific receptor sites, to temporarily eliminate men's virility. It keeps sperm from maturing all the way--and that's about it. Binded to the hormone, they don't need a very high dose, which eliminates side effects. All it does is make the sperm unviable. Sounds good, huh? Especially compared to female hormonal birth control, which, as many of us know, causes a lot of side effects.
But my question is, will men take to it? I read another article that said male contraceptive methods are pointless because (a) it's impossible to expect men to be responsible enough to take a medication regularly, and (b) there's no way men will ever want to take a pill that reduces their virility.
That really irked me. I mean, I don't want to be the feminist who cried sexist, but isn't it pretty short-sighted to say that we can't hold men to do these things when women are expected to do them everyday--with the added burden of terrible side effects? I don't know many women who actually like altering their bodies' natural processes and rendering themselves infertile, but many of us do it.
There are a few things from the article that seem to express a similar underlying bigoted outlook. (I bolded them in the article.) The doctor/researcher interviewed in the article said several things that hint that there's a double standard when it comes to birth control: the medical community and the world at large don't seem to care that hormonal b.c. is inconvenient and unpleasant for women, but they wouldn't dare try to use the same treatments on men if they altered the role of hormones in their body. As if meddling with women's hormonal balance doesn't cause "problematic side effects"!
I thought it was very odd that the article says that injection is unacceptable when many women take Depo Provera injections every three months! (Then again it might be different since this drug has been tested with intravenous injections rather than subdermal or muscular injections.)
So what do you think? Should we hold the same expectations for men that many people do for women--to take an active role in preventing pregnancy and bearing some of the (maybe event unpleasant!) burden of that responsibility? Are men capable of this? Are you excited at the prospect of male contraceptives? Do you think the attitudes I described are sexist or fair? Is the lack of faith in men's ability to deal with birth control realistic?
Personally I am sort of hopeful because maybe if a really good male contraceptive option (that causes few side effects) becomes available, it will eliminate problems for heterosexually active males and females. Which would be great!
( male birth control article HERE )