please help vp!!!! "colposcopy protocol" questions under cut
<lj-cut text="read more">so here's the deal. almost exactly a year ago (when i was19, almost 20) i went in for an annual exam. had a pap done and fast-forward....comes out abnormal. they test it and yup, got a high-risk strain of hpv. immediately i'm scheduled for a colposcopy. went in, had a biopsy done, doctor checks it, informs me that it's nothing to worry about (pretty sure it was low grade dysplasia). she then tells me to come in for another one 6 months later (november 2007). have that one done. she says things have stayed pretty stable and may have gotten slightly better. tells me to come in for yet another one in 6 months (this coming may). she told me that we'd do a leep procedure if there was still abnormal tissue after the 3rd colpol and go back to paps after that.
so yesterday i went in for some std testing and to get back on birth control at a different clinic. it had been about two years so i wanted to get updated on everything. as the nurse practitioner was looking through my file she asked what sti i'd had. i told her hpv and explained that i'd gotten two colposcopys and would be going in for another one in may. she was absolutely appalled at this. she told me that at my age they (her clinic) wouldn't have even done a colposcopy. they would have continued with paps and testing for hpv dna, and if it was still abnormal, then a colposcopy and possible leep. in fact, they don't even start doing paps until 22. she said at my age most people clear the virus within a year. she was also confused at why i'd even gotten a pap in the first place. i told her i'd always thought you had to start getting them when you started having sex. she thought it was completely unneccessary. basically, she couldn't believe everything i'd had done and thought the other clinic hadn't informed me properly about what i should be having done at what age and had waaaay overtreated me. she suggested i not have the colpol in may done. i released my medical records to them sooo they'll be calling me soon with their opinion after seeing that. my big question with this is, if I had gone this route and not gotten a pap til 22 and therefore possibly never known about the hpv....isn't that a bad thing? because i wouldn't have been able to inform future partners?
now i'm just SO confused. who's right? i understand there are different schools of thought out there about treatment but geez this was like polar opposites! the latter clinic suggested i get a second opinion. i'll definitely be doing that but i was wondering what everyone here thought. i just feel really well....(to be dramatic) lost. those colposcopys were PAINFUL and if they were unneccesary, i'm really disappointed. and should paps not be done til 22? could this be a money issue on the former clinics behalf? ugh i'm just trying to figure this out. </lj-cut>