of bleeding and pregnancy (kind of)
Sep. 29th, 2008 08:47 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(I couldn't think of a title for this entry to save my life. Thus, it is lame. Please forgive this.)
This is kind of a weird question - not really one of "I don't know what to do," but more along the lines of "hey, my solution to this kinda sucks; does anyone have a better one?”
I'm one of the unlucky ones whose ovaries have it in for her. My periods are impossible to predict, even after almost eight continuous years on HBC (I've been on, by my count, at least a dozen different pills). When they get around to showing up, they are heavy, painful, and long. Today was, I believe, the final day of my period - which ends 19 days of continuous bleeding and cramping. This period was seven days early; the one before that was almost three months late. I've been having workups to determine the cause of my innumerable GYN problems since I was in kindergarten, and we've pretty much concluded that, save cancer, everything that can be wrong with my reproductive system is wrong with it.
I am not now nor have I ever been sexually active, and I highly doubt I will become so for at least the next several years. However, I've been thinking more and more lately about how many women rely on getting their periods as their surefire indicator that they aren't pregnant, and how, with my cycle as unreliable as it is, I will not have that indicator.
Now, granted, I have no intention of having unprotected sex until I feel ready and able to handle the potential consequences of doing so, and given my preexisting conditions, it may be difficult for me to conceive even when I try to, let alone while actively trying to prevent it. But I’ve heard way, way too many stories that end in “...but I got pregnant anyway” to not be wary of trusting my chosen methods to work as intended without the reassurance of a bleed.
(I just realized that I probably sound batshit paranoid, especially for someone for whom pregnancy is not an immediate concern. Please forgive that. I work for an abortion provider, so I think about unintended pregnancies and how to prevent them...er, slightly more than the average person, lol.)
The only real solution to this that I can come up with is to take a pregnancy test every month and ensure it comes out negative. I’m not necessarily opposed to doing so; as I said, I work in gynecology and probably will very long-term, so my access to pregnancy tests is reasonably unrestricted. However, I’d prefer to avoid the panic of doing so once a month until menopause – and if, for whatever reason, I stopped working in gynecology, that’s something that could get really expensive really fast.
So, my question would be: for those of you with hopelessly wacked-out periods like me who can’t rely on a bleed for anything, how do you reassure yourself that you’re not pregnant?
(Good Lord, did this post make any sense? So sorry if it didn’t; it strikes me as a little discombobulated. Feel free to ask me for clarification of just what in the world I’m talking about, lol.)
This is kind of a weird question - not really one of "I don't know what to do," but more along the lines of "hey, my solution to this kinda sucks; does anyone have a better one?”
I'm one of the unlucky ones whose ovaries have it in for her. My periods are impossible to predict, even after almost eight continuous years on HBC (I've been on, by my count, at least a dozen different pills). When they get around to showing up, they are heavy, painful, and long. Today was, I believe, the final day of my period - which ends 19 days of continuous bleeding and cramping. This period was seven days early; the one before that was almost three months late. I've been having workups to determine the cause of my innumerable GYN problems since I was in kindergarten, and we've pretty much concluded that, save cancer, everything that can be wrong with my reproductive system is wrong with it.
I am not now nor have I ever been sexually active, and I highly doubt I will become so for at least the next several years. However, I've been thinking more and more lately about how many women rely on getting their periods as their surefire indicator that they aren't pregnant, and how, with my cycle as unreliable as it is, I will not have that indicator.
Now, granted, I have no intention of having unprotected sex until I feel ready and able to handle the potential consequences of doing so, and given my preexisting conditions, it may be difficult for me to conceive even when I try to, let alone while actively trying to prevent it. But I’ve heard way, way too many stories that end in “...but I got pregnant anyway” to not be wary of trusting my chosen methods to work as intended without the reassurance of a bleed.
(I just realized that I probably sound batshit paranoid, especially for someone for whom pregnancy is not an immediate concern. Please forgive that. I work for an abortion provider, so I think about unintended pregnancies and how to prevent them...er, slightly more than the average person, lol.)
The only real solution to this that I can come up with is to take a pregnancy test every month and ensure it comes out negative. I’m not necessarily opposed to doing so; as I said, I work in gynecology and probably will very long-term, so my access to pregnancy tests is reasonably unrestricted. However, I’d prefer to avoid the panic of doing so once a month until menopause – and if, for whatever reason, I stopped working in gynecology, that’s something that could get really expensive really fast.
So, my question would be: for those of you with hopelessly wacked-out periods like me who can’t rely on a bleed for anything, how do you reassure yourself that you’re not pregnant?
(Good Lord, did this post make any sense? So sorry if it didn’t; it strikes me as a little discombobulated. Feel free to ask me for clarification of just what in the world I’m talking about, lol.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:16 am (UTC)(My doctor is also my boss, so getting a second opinion is, shall we say, a matter of some delicacy, lol.)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:28 am (UTC)In addition to PCOS, I have endometriosis (I had surgery to lyse adhesions almost five years ago), and the combination results in (occasionally debilitating) chronic pelvic pain, which is not always necessarily related to menstruation. I underwent precocious puberty (breast development at roughly 5-6, menarche at 9), which kinda started the ball rolling on trying to figure out what all was wrong with me. I have reasonably severe vestibulodynia, which is always worse during my periods, and have demonstrated evidence of vaginismus.
Not my personal history, I realize, but I also have a very strong family history of ovarian, cervical, and uterine cancers.
As far as the future is concerned, I do desire pregnancy one day - when, and if that will even be possible, remains to be seen.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:43 am (UTC)Mom has a deformed pelvis, it's twice as big on the inside so she couldn't give birth to a lemon. Her mother was given thalidomide(?) that drug that caused all the birth defects. I read an article in which the person who wrote it suspected that the grandchildren of the woman who used it generally have endo. Something about the drug effecting genes in the original embryo and the eggs that embryo contained... I wish I'd have bookmarked the article.
My doctor let me go on continuous birth control until I was willing to make more permanent decisions about my organs. That was when I was nineteen (and very, very scared!). Now I'm 26, getting married, have insurance and a Plan. Which is basically try hard to have two babies, know when to call it a day, possibly adopt and definitely have everything removed.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:23 am (UTC)Consider the fact that there are methods like Seasonale out there where users are only supposed to have periods once every 3 months. Those users aren't expected to have to see their period every month, or assume that they're pregnant. It sounds stupid, but maybe just thinking about how they don't *need* to see a period every month to still be protected from pregnancy might make you feel a bit better about it too. And I'm sure you already know this, but BC works by preventing ovulation, thickening cervical mucus, and thinning the endometrial lining, all factors that help to prevent pregnancy, so unless you had a major user error, you would have absolutely no reason to doubt your protection beyond your missing period -- and you already know that that is quite normal for you. Someone who had very regular periods and missed one entirely would definitely have reason to worry, but someone who got them sporadically and continued to do so would have no reason to suspect that something was wrong.
Personally I wouldn't like not getting my period at all, for the same reason you mention. However, I'm fine stacking birth control for two months to avoid a period, or something like that, and don't worry about pregnancy because I know there's been no slipups in my use. Hopefully between going over the multiple ways BC works, and remembering that you are using it perfectly and that you have irregular periods on or off BC, will be enough to cut down on the anxiety and maybe you'll only need to test every couple of months, or not at all.
If just HBC just isn't enough for you, there's always using condoms and/or withdrawal on top of it -- lowering the chances of pregnancy, even in a perfectly normal-cycled woman, to almost entirely zero. With multiple methods you'd have even less reason to suspect at all you were pregnant, since you know that you have irregular periods anyway, and that you used a whole ton of protection to boot.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:33 am (UTC)I think a huge percentage of my concerns are related to what I see in practice - women who come in with extremely advanced pregnancies who've had no reason to suspect they were pregnant in the first place, for example. It's easy for me to see myself in the same position, birth control or no.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:10 pm (UTC)It's tough to word what I'm about to say correctly, so I'll just repeat what my trainer said. (Who, I assure you, is the most feminist and non-judgmental woman I've ever met.) In many cases, there is either a lot of denial, body disconnection, or some other extenuating life situation that is behind why the client did not realize she was pregnant until that point, or why the pregnancy was able to occur.
Obviously, there are some cases where those factors don't play into it. But while we absolutely never second-guess our clients, we also recognize that we don't always get the full story. That's fine -- we don't have any right to know anything other than what our clients choose to tell us -- but we do keep in mind that often there are reasons a client will not tell us everything, or is not even ready to recognize the circumstances.
As one example that I do know of, we saw a client once in the situation you describe -- shocked and stunned, had no idea she was pregnant, reported regular periods. The client reported that in the last year she had only been sexually active once, about two months prior, and was taking HBC regularly and used condoms. We 100% believed her, and referred her for a pre-procedure physical exam.
After the ultrasound indicated that the client was closer to 24 weeks, the client confided to us that the real story was much, much different. I won't get into that, but the point is that I would never personally base my fears off of what I see in the clinic -- while women often share with us the entirety of their situation, others are either not ready to do so, or not psychologically able to do so, or may have some kind of very serious (even life threatening) situational reason why they cannot do so.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:24 pm (UTC)I'll admit one thing, for instance -- to this day, when a doctor who isn't my personal doctor asks if I'm sexually active and, if so, what kind of contraception I'm using, I tell them HBC. (I used to also say condoms, which I've used... twice in my life.) I haven't taken the pill in five years and never will again. I haven't used condoms in seven years.
I'm not proud of that, but it's a knee-jerk. At this point, if I became pregnant unexpectedly I'd just pretend it was planned, but a couple of years ago I'd bet good money I would have stuck to my other story.
Even in the most non-judgmental environment possible (in my case, a feminist women's clinic), that pressure definitely still does exist. It's not created by the clinic or their standards, but by society -- this nasty and pervasive idea that if a woman becomes pregnant, it is her "fault" for not using better protection. Asserting correct contraceptive use is an emotional shield against that kind of incoming judgment.
So many clients are terrified of that judgment. To them the idea of disclosing that they were not using contraception, or not using it correctly, to a medical professional is far too threatening to consider. It may even be threatening enough that they convince themselves that correct use was the case.
Anyway, just more food for thought when it comes to balancing out the many failed contraception stories we see.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:28 am (UTC)One person's "batshit paranoid" may be another's "excellent advance planning skills." ;) There's no harm in wanting to avoid as much panic as possible, you know?
Things that have helped me in the past:
Monitoring fertility signs, though depending on your particular ovary issues, this might not work for you. And if you're on HBC, it likely won't work anyway. But when I'm not on HBC, I have cycles that are pretty sensitive to stress (particularly stress involving travel and/or seeing my mother) -- and therefore prone to becoming anovulatory and long. It was a big help to me to be able to determine that I had not, in fact, ovulated during that time -- and so the length was due to my body going, "Must. Not. Ovulate. Now." and not going, "Whee, bay-beez!"
Choosing a contraceptive method that's very reliable and very difficult to "mess up." When I had an IUD, it was pretty nice knowing that as long as I didn't, you know, reach into my crotch and yank it out, it was going to keep working, without any kind of daily requirements from me. And it was going to keep working at an effectiveness rate of over 99% out in real life. Besides IUDs, methods like Implanon and depo would probably fall into this category (and sterilization, which may or may not be something you're looking for).
Choosing a contraceptive method where light or absent periods are a "standard" side effect. When I switched from my ParaGard to HBC, the reduction in my periods was drastic, and it's become more drastic over time. (I'd regularly bleed heavily for 10-12 days without HBC, with or without a ParaGard in place. On my last withdrawal "bleed" from HBC, there were cramps, but there was no blood at all.) It probably would have freaked me out if I hadn't known that this was a run-of-the-mill kind of effect. It can be hit or miss with pills, patches, shots, rings, and rods, but it seems to be a pretty reliable side effect of Mirena.
Combining contraceptive methods and doing the math. I've never used this one on myself, but I've often done the math for folks on VP. For instance, if BC pills have an 8% failure rate with typical use, and condoms have a 15% failure rate with typical use, then the combined rate is 8% X 15%, which is 1.2%. If an IUD has a typical use failure rate of 0.8% (or less, depending on source and type of IUD), the same IUD + condoms works out to a typical use failure rate of 0.12% over the course of a year. There are certainly folks who will get pregnant anyway, but in terms of statistics, it's incredibly unlikely.
Like I said, I'm not sure if any of these are feasible options for you, but they are things that have helped me not to worry when I don't bleed as much or as often as expected.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 04:39 am (UTC)The last section would be by far the hardest for me to get behind, but it is probably all I have to go on. As I mentioned to
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:49 am (UTC)I'd also seriously consider going under for a Mirena insertion, or having Implanon put in. Have you ever done progestin-only bcp? a 3 month trial on Micronor might be in order, to see the effect on the pain levels and such. I worry that not controlling your bleeding is going to put you at (even more increased) risk for hyperplasia, and with a fhx of uterine ca (was it endometrial?), you don't need that.
more two dollars than two cents, but you know how it goes ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:49 pm (UTC)I'm sure the most recent bleeding is due to the Yaz - I was wary of going on a pill with such a low dose of ee in the first place, but wanted to give the drospirenone a shot for the PCOS. I'm also keeping in mind that this was my first bleed since starting Yaz (mid-August), so I'm unsurprised that my bleeding is currently screwy. (I transitioned from Femcon to Yaz, and I'd been on Femcon for...at least three years, I believe...so I've tried the higher ee dosages too.)
I confess that I completely and utterly forgot about Micronor. I tried that MANY moons ago, with no effect on my cycle, but I'd sure be willing to try it again. I'm wary of Mirena or Implanon because of the constant release; I can't tolerate continuous hormonal doses sans break.
ETA: And yes, it was endometrial. My aunt (maternal) was dx with cervical CA in 2001-02, tx with chemo/nuclear medicine, clear x 5 years. Started bleeding last Christmas; endo bx in January confirmed CA was back. She had a TAH in February that dx endometrial and ovarian CA, for which she's now in treatment.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 12:44 pm (UTC)about HBC, i seem to have better luck with nausea if i take them right before bed as opposed to sometime throughout the day.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 01:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-30 11:59 pm (UTC)I think if you THINK about it in the right way, it can become no more stressful than waiting for your period each month.
I probably have not given it adequate consideration that testing each month for me would be roughly equivalent to waiting for your period each month for a woman with regular periods. Doesn't necessarily mean I would freak out any less if my periods were like clockwork, but still. And given that I've never had to wait for my period to confirm I'm not pregnant, or take a pregnancy test, it'd probably be easy for me to overlook that.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 04:39 am (UTC)