![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I feel like this could be such an obvious and silly question, but: does it make sense for a virgin to go to the gyno if her family history is clean and she's never had any sexual contact with anyone? My mother knows absolutely nothing about my sexual history and I'd like to keep it that way for a while. I'm eighteen, so I'm not worried about my doctor telling her anything. However, she's convinced that it's pointless.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:11 am (UTC)I don't understand the logic of this. Why do we think women need to be examined to "make sure they're ok" when they've finished developing, but we don't think men do? It seems completely sexist to me, like women can't develop without a doctor's help, yet men can.
Also, the point of any medical test is to get a useful answer. It doesn't make sense to test people before they need to be tested, just to get them used to the idea! That's a waste of time and money that could be used to treat people who are actually sick.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 01:21 am (UTC)Rare, totally - but still possible.
Also, I've heard may male and female doctors complain about the lack of young men coming in for check-ups.
Its got nothing to do with who can and can't develop without the "help" of a doctor.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:07 am (UTC)women should too!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:42 am (UTC)that's not sexist. it's fact.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:02 pm (UTC)Do a little research, maybe call a gyno yourself and make the appointment (if you can get yourself there.) Tell your mom that you've heard that it's a good idea, and you want to make sure that you can have children one day, etc. Parents have a hard time saying no when you're protecting their future grandparent-hood.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:37 pm (UTC)Unless she was worried about her mom having hpv or something when she was born?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:16 pm (UTC)I would strongly recommend going, just to make sure everything is normal. If you have a tilted uterus or an unusually thick hymen or something along those lines, it would be nice to find out now, so it won't become a (painful) issue later on.
If you feel like you can't openly reason with your mother about this, you can always tell her that you think you have a yeast infection and you would like to visit the gyno for that reason. It's quite possible and common to get a yeast infection without being sexually active.
But in any case, you're an adult and she has no control over your medical records. As long as you can find your own transportation and the means to pay, you can always make a gyno appointment on your own if you want. Planned Parenthood often has a sliding-scale payment system if you're low on money. Call them and discuss what they think is best.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:48 pm (UTC)Make the appointment and go. If she questions it tell her that you felt it was best. You are, after all, an adult. One of the cool things about being an adult is you get to make your own decisions.
OT- but kinda related
Date: 2007-05-18 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:56 pm (UTC)A good way to convince your mom that it's time for you to go (as in your mature enough to make your own health decisions), is if you book the appointment yourself. Tell her the day before, "Mom, I've made an appointment to get a check up with Dr. Smith. I'm feeling fine, but I just want to learn about birth control or the HPV vaccine. I'm 18 now and I think it's a good idea that I go."
no subject
Date: 2007-05-17 11:59 pm (UTC)No, it doesn't make any sense for an 18-year-old virgin to see a gynecologist, unless you have a problem such as painful periods that needs to be investigated. The recommendation in the US is three years after vaginal intercourse or age 21, whichever comes first. Your mom is right: if you're not having problems, it's pointless. In most countries other than the US, women never see a gynecologist unless they have a major problem their regular doctor can't handle.
That said, if you want to go, go. Eighteen year olds are allowed to make their own medical decisions.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:23 am (UTC)I would like to see where you got this info, as I have never heard it before. A three year wait AFTER beginning to have sex? that can't be right, can it?
I don't see how you can say a visit would be pointless. She might be having problems, but not every problem is something you can see. It's best to get checked out, too, before any problems get worse. Not to mention the education about sex and birth control she could get from the doctor.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:32 am (UTC)Additionally, those exams are generally performed by our general practitioners, are gynecologists are considered specialists in Canada and are not seen unless a patient has a specific reproductive health problem that cannot be handled by a GP.
The current US guidelines (http://www.4woman.gov/faq/pap.htm#pap02) recommend starting pelvic exams and pap smears if you've been sexually active for three years or more, or are 21 years old, whichever comes first.
As we can see from this comment thread, many, many people have more commonly heard the older "age 18 or when becoming sexually active" guidelines. While it's always wonderful to access more care if you are in a position to do so, current medical guidelines in the US indicate that it's not totally necessary.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:45 am (UTC)I ended up starting birth control at 15 (my periods were completely ridiculous) and have had an annual exam since... well before I was sexually active. So yeah, there are plenty of reasons for non-sexually active girls to go.
If you feel like you should get checked out, you absolutely should. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. If it'll make you feel better, knowing that everything is OK, then go for it!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 05:11 am (UTC)Be safe. Get checked up.