the saga of scented menstrual products
Jun. 8th, 2004 02:36 pmI don't know if anyone remembers, but awhile ago I posted about Stayfree now making some of their pads scented (or more specifically, "Now with odor neutralizers!" which turned out to be lemon scented). Yesterday I also saw that Always is starting to make scented pads as well - I have no idea why manufacturers have decided to revive the trend of scented pads, but I think it's a crummy idea.
Anyway, I wrote to Stayfree to share my concern about scented products. They replied with a standard email apologizing for my unpleasant experience and asking for my address so that they could refund the purchase price. I emailed them back explaining that my main wish was that they make *unscented* versions of all pads or at the very least make it more apparent from the packaging that pads are scented. They sent a standardized reply to that as well, assuring me that my financial compensation was on the way. I hope they actually read what I wrote at some point.
Today I received two coupons for any of their products costing up to $5. Somewhat ironic, but useful enough for me since I can use it for ob tampons, which they haven't managed to mess with yet (luckily!).
Just thought I'd share in case anyone else has been unhappy with the new scented pads. Perhaps if they get several letters, they'll reconsider.
Anyway, I wrote to Stayfree to share my concern about scented products. They replied with a standard email apologizing for my unpleasant experience and asking for my address so that they could refund the purchase price. I emailed them back explaining that my main wish was that they make *unscented* versions of all pads or at the very least make it more apparent from the packaging that pads are scented. They sent a standardized reply to that as well, assuring me that my financial compensation was on the way. I hope they actually read what I wrote at some point.
Today I received two coupons for any of their products costing up to $5. Somewhat ironic, but useful enough for me since I can use it for ob tampons, which they haven't managed to mess with yet (luckily!).
Just thought I'd share in case anyone else has been unhappy with the new scented pads. Perhaps if they get several letters, they'll reconsider.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 03:23 pm (UTC)I, too, switched to Always because of the scent issue, and I'll be very angry if I can't find unscented pads in the future. [I'm not a Kotex fan, they don't sit right in my undies.]
no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 03:53 pm (UTC)I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks Kotex doesn't sit right. I use their pantyliners sometimes, and it bunches up where it counts. x.o
no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-09 08:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-08 10:13 pm (UTC)Always added something recently (or my skin just gave up and refused to use them) which has made my skin incredibly angry. I haven't used them in a couple months and I'm still working on getting the rash to go away. I generally only use cotton flannel reuseable pads on my non-tampon days, but keep Always on hand if I'll be out all day or out of town. I hope the last vestiges of this rash heal soon.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-09 05:02 am (UTC)I haven't had a problem with the Natracare (thus far) which claim to be 100% coton, and am going to use them until I get some reusable pads (which is when I get the money to start buying some).
no subject
Date: 2004-06-09 12:05 pm (UTC)nasty, irritating, carcinogenic goo"fresh gel" to keep you feeling dry. (as in, so dry your labia chap)It's the same crap they put in babies diapers'. They used to put it in tampons, too, but there's a law against that now.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-09 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-09 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-09 08:20 pm (UTC)They've also been linked recently to asthma and other respiratory problems, and I'm pretty sure that article can be found on mothering.com somewhere.
I think I tracked down the article
Date: 2004-06-09 09:26 pm (UTC)" And what about the material that makes "superabsorbent" diapers so absorbent? If you've ever used disposable diapers, you've probably noticed beads of clear gel on your baby's genitals after a diaper change. Superabsorbent diapers contain sodium polyacrylate, which absorbs up to 100 times its weight in water. Sodium polyacrylate is the same substance that was removed from tampons in 1985 because of its link to toxic shock syndrome.7 No studies have been done on the long-term effects of this chemical being in contact with a baby's reproductive organs 24 hours a day for upwards of two years."
They also express concern about dioxins, which can be carcinogenic with repeated exposure.
But in my mind, pads aren't totally analogous to diapers (far less skin contact, not soaked with urine, and only used by adults), and both are entirely different from tampons. It bugs me a little that they mention TSS: Toxic shock has to do with bacterial growth in the vagina, and just because a material provides a good breeding ground for bacteria doesn't make it unsafe to touch.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-09 09:12 am (UTC)