![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
The New York Times
July 18, 2006
Essay
A New Vaccine for Girls, but Should It Be Compulsory?
By RONI RABIN
Around the time report cards came home this spring, federal health officials approved another new vaccine to add to the ever-growing list of recommended childhood shots — this one for girls and women only, from 9 to 26, to protect them from genital warts and cervical cancer.
One of my own daughters, who just turned 9, would be a candidate for this vaccine, so I’ve been mulling this over. A shot that protects against cancer sounds like a great idea, at first. States may choose to make it mandatory, though the cost for them to do so would be prohibitive.
( Read more... )
I usually don't disagree with articles in the health section, but this one rubs me the wrong way.
July 18, 2006
Essay
A New Vaccine for Girls, but Should It Be Compulsory?
By RONI RABIN
Around the time report cards came home this spring, federal health officials approved another new vaccine to add to the ever-growing list of recommended childhood shots — this one for girls and women only, from 9 to 26, to protect them from genital warts and cervical cancer.
One of my own daughters, who just turned 9, would be a candidate for this vaccine, so I’ve been mulling this over. A shot that protects against cancer sounds like a great idea, at first. States may choose to make it mandatory, though the cost for them to do so would be prohibitive.
( Read more... )
I usually don't disagree with articles in the health section, but this one rubs me the wrong way.