(no subject)
Aug. 19th, 2002 11:11 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
i just realized how badly i never ever wanna get aids or any other kind of std...
and im incredibly thankful that i havent gotten any diseases and quite relieved considering who ive slept w/
and im incredibly thankful that i havent gotten any diseases and quite relieved considering who ive slept w/
no subject
Date: 2002-08-19 11:19 pm (UTC)and really hear you on this one
minus the who ive slept with part
but still
gosh
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 08:08 am (UTC)STDs, I feel that this post is not in the best interest of our
readership here at VaginaPagina. I was frustrated as I read it, for
one. We here at VP want to work to erase the stigma associated with
STDs, and we are here to be a supportive community. I feel that
this post might hurt the feelings and self-acceptance of many here.
STDs are not a curse, a sign of being unlucky, or a punishment.
They can happen with 1 encounter or not happen with 1000. They are
a part of life.
We also want to advocate safe(r) sex, while still making everyone
aware that a lot of STDs (herpes, HPV, etc, etc) are not stopped
completely by condoms, dental dams, or any other barrier method.
The viruses are so tiny that they can pass through latex and
polyurethane. We advocate these methods combined with testing and
education, as well as acceptance.
Viva la vulva!!!
no subject
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 08:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 08:26 am (UTC)i nearly cried when i first read this.
i lost my uncle to AIDS five years ago, and i still cannot even begin to articulate my sadness and indignation.
once again, the VagPag administrators have made me happy and proud to be a member here.
you don't know how important this place is to me.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 08:29 am (UTC)we all need to stick together in the different sturggles we face with our lives and body, and I'm just glad VP is one of those avenues of acheiveing this.
xxxooxox
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 01:16 pm (UTC)<3
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 08:37 am (UTC)I am very, very happy that you feel safe and happy/proud to be here.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 01:15 pm (UTC)and on a more personal note, i thank you for your kind words.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 08:55 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 12:27 pm (UTC)yes, it seems that no one is immune to aids-related deaths of loved ones and relatives.
too many people have died.
thanks for your kind words.
Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 02:58 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 04:54 pm (UTC)hee.
and, um, i'm diggin' the hair action, d00d.
Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 07:22 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 07:32 pm (UTC)oooooh, neat-0.
it looks like you've got a banana clip permanently attached to your head.
in the good way.
Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 07:34 pm (UTC)... ah, but I remember banana clips! Those were the days of tightrolling and keds! :P
Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 08:16 pm (UTC)and i always matched my socks with my shirt.
no matter how many colors were on said shirt.
hee.
your hair is down to your butt?
my my.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 02:44 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 02:58 pm (UTC)However, let me say this--I am certainly glad that lovexxx is healthy! Very glad. My worry lies with the aside she made about being relieved, esp. considering who she's slept with (I'm paraphrasing, I hope correctly), which prompted my above comments. I want to add safe(r) sex info for those who are reading, etc.
That being said, we here at VP definitely want everyone to continue to express their opinions, which is why I did not delete the post! I, as a member, just wanted to add my sentiments.
I definitely want this community to unify and not break us into factions. Hopefully this makes sense.
Happy day.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 03:05 pm (UTC)food for thought. as I am an admin as well, I feel that the statement in itself is not wrong, and not shameful for thinking, but posting it in a community dedicated to vaginas and womens health is not productive. which is why bizetsy spoke up appropriately.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 04:35 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 04:57 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 05:05 pm (UTC)what does that say to the women who do have them? how are they supposed to recieve that information? objectively? happy for her? maybe in a perfect world, in a politically correct world that would be the ideal response, but the truth is there are over 800 women on this forum, a large percentage of them having an STD and having had to deal with plenty of complications due to these STDs, seeing that type of post is not productive to anyone.
the key word is productive. it's not educating or productive, though it has brought forth this thread which I am thankful for as we can all learn something from this.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 05:33 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 05:52 pm (UTC)what I did say is that sensitive subjects shouldnt be displayed in this way in order to express happiness that one is not like other girls due to having a disease or illness.
and in fact, the girl was not shooshed. she was made aware that statements like that can unknowingly affect people in a negative manner, and in turn the coomunity was educated on many things concerning STDs, condom usage and member support.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 07:21 pm (UTC)I think its great to celebrate (sexual) health; no one was ever being critical of that aspect of
Do you see where I'm going with this?
We also don't encourage posts that say simply, "Boy, am I glad I'm not pregnant!" or "Gee, I'm relieved I my period's here," etc. Posts in this community require context! Things like this generally annoy other readers and clog up friends' pages across the land. The posters usually mean well, but could do better to remember to frame and word their posts appropriately so that they will have some relevance to the community and won't violate any aspect of our Safe Space.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-21 08:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 07:27 pm (UTC)This community IS a Safe Space (see our FAQ for a definition) and all users should therefore feel comfortable sharing their truths, so OF COURSE
I agree with you that this was a somewhat touchy situation and not clear-cut at all; however, it has at least inspried some discussion and education, which is all sorts of good.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-21 07:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 03:11 pm (UTC)but the issue with transmitting STDs like Herpes and HPV despite condom use isn't because the viruses pass through the latex, but it's because of viral shedding, (when the virus is very close to or on the surface of the skin before an outbreak) and the presence of sores/warts in places that make be contacted during intercourse but aren't covered by barriers.
Polyurethane condoms are recommended only for people with latex sensitivities and allergies primarly because they have a higher failure rate than latex condoms. In other words...they break more easily because they don't stretch as much and are harder to put on.
Animal skin condoms however...viruses and bacteria can pass through the pores present in them. Sperm are too large to pass through those pores though.
I spend part of my day talking to groups of young people who look at me in astonishment when I tell them that there are 14 steps to putting on a condom, that every hour 2 people under the age of 25 become infected with HIV, that there are 650,000 new cases of gonorrhea each year, that there are three million cases of chlamydia diagnosed each year or that it's estimated that between 50 and 75% of all sexually active people will become infected with genital warts (HPV) in their lifetime. You're right-the statistics are staggering. It's in all of our best interest to educate ourselves, so we can share our knowledge with others.
And, as I tell people every day when I work with them..."Know what's normal for your body, so that you know when something isn't."
Re:
Date: 2002-08-20 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 03:21 pm (UTC)(Sometimes I enjoy doing this kind of thing more here than I do at my day job!)
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 04:11 pm (UTC)Breakage rates are Controversial.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 04:46 pm (UTC)As for failure rates...you're right about the variance. (I went to check what the package says, but I apparently have all the condoms in the condomfish and none in boxes at the moment.) IIRC, the Avanti package does have something about the FDA having approved the condoms but it doesn't make the same claims as the packaging that latex condoms do. My own experience (polyurethane is all I've used for the last six or seven years) is that they haven't broken at all, and I had more issues with latex than with polyurethane.
This is unfortunatly, from 1995, but that's just before the polyurethane condoms were really introduced to the market.
Another article from 1998 or 1999 about efficacy and polyurethane condoms.
A study from Johns Hopkins, which quoted a 6.6% failure rate of polyurethane condoms...a bit small on sample size, but it looked reasonably valid.
From the American Medical Association's Women's health group and published in 1998 or 99.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 01:50 pm (UTC)My own experience (polyurethane is all I've used for the last six or seven years) is that they haven't broken at all, and I had more issues with latex than with polyurethane.
Ditto.
A quick glance suggests those last three links are all basically referencing the same study (Frezieres)... and I hope the author of the first had 'The wearer should follow the same directions as for using latex condoms' on a macro key :))
no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-22 04:39 pm (UTC)http://www.gmhp.demon.co.uk/guides/femidom/ is one, but I'd suggest losing the inner ring...
no subject
Date: 2002-08-23 04:00 am (UTC)I'm hoarding all the copies of the instructions that I can find, as they turn up in the office....I've got about six copies in my desk now. But our new case of them came and they're called "The Female Condom" and it's just not nearly as much fun to talk about adding more lube to Reality.
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 05:26 pm (UTC)Whoa.
I think I'm missing out on something. *ponders*
Ok, now I wanna know what I'm not doing...
Would you care to enlighten me...pleeeease? :)
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 08:23 pm (UTC)and please make sure to ask one of the vp admins to archive it for the vp page.
thanks so much!
no subject
Date: 2002-08-20 08:56 pm (UTC)rock.
Re:
Date: 2002-08-21 06:06 am (UTC)thanks so much!