![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
Questioning the Need for Routine Pelvic Exam
Commentary Argues It Deters Regular Gynecological Care
( For healthy women with no symptoms of disease, a routine pelvic exam serves little purposeāand may be so disliked that it dissuades some women from getting regular gynecological care. "If a woman is asymptomatic and feeling fine, getting naked on a table with stirrups and a speculum is not adding extra value," says lead author Carolyn Westhoff, a professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Columbia University Medical Center and of epidemiology at the Mailman School of Public Health. )
I am, of course, offended and enraged that the justifications for exams are money, fear of litigation, and that it "sanctifies" the visit. What the hell? I would also argue against the idea of a pelvic exam being "necessary periodically," unless it is to evauate symptoms. If it's not necessary, it's not necessary, period.
See also:
http://www.managingcontraception.com/newsevents/dr-bob/pelvic-exam-necessary-for-contraception-rx/
http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/200806/200806stewart.pdf
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_105865.html :
"Many doctors require that women have a pelvic exam before they can get a prescription for birth control pills, despite guidelines saying that the step is unnecessary, a new study finds[....]Overall, 29 percent of ob-gyns and 33 percent of family doctors said they always required a pelvic exam for women seeking birth control pills. In addition, half of ob-gyns and about 45 percent of family doctors said they usually required the exam. Advanced-practice nurses specializing in women's health were the least likely to require a pelvic exam, with 16 percent saying they always did so. In contrast, nurses specializing in family medicine were more likely than all other providers to always require a pelvic exam; 45 percent said they did."
I would have guessed, from people reporting here at VP and elsewhere, that the actual percent of doctors requring (or at least, appearing to require) pelvic exams before precribing HBC is actually much higher than above. What I don't understand is, where's the outrage? Why do I feel like I'm the only one furious about the unnessary hurdles placed on people seeking birth control? It has eroded what little trust I ever had for the medical profession (since more health care providers really ought to be speaking out against it) and made me feel as if I have to be adversarial and hyper-viligant any time I need any sort of health care.
Commentary Argues It Deters Regular Gynecological Care
( For healthy women with no symptoms of disease, a routine pelvic exam serves little purposeāand may be so disliked that it dissuades some women from getting regular gynecological care. "If a woman is asymptomatic and feeling fine, getting naked on a table with stirrups and a speculum is not adding extra value," says lead author Carolyn Westhoff, a professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Columbia University Medical Center and of epidemiology at the Mailman School of Public Health. )
I am, of course, offended and enraged that the justifications for exams are money, fear of litigation, and that it "sanctifies" the visit. What the hell? I would also argue against the idea of a pelvic exam being "necessary periodically," unless it is to evauate symptoms. If it's not necessary, it's not necessary, period.
See also:
http://www.managingcontraception.com/newsevents/dr-bob/pelvic-exam-necessary-for-contraception-rx/
http://www.racgp.org.au/afp/200806/200806stewart.pdf
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_105865.html :
"Many doctors require that women have a pelvic exam before they can get a prescription for birth control pills, despite guidelines saying that the step is unnecessary, a new study finds[....]Overall, 29 percent of ob-gyns and 33 percent of family doctors said they always required a pelvic exam for women seeking birth control pills. In addition, half of ob-gyns and about 45 percent of family doctors said they usually required the exam. Advanced-practice nurses specializing in women's health were the least likely to require a pelvic exam, with 16 percent saying they always did so. In contrast, nurses specializing in family medicine were more likely than all other providers to always require a pelvic exam; 45 percent said they did."
I would have guessed, from people reporting here at VP and elsewhere, that the actual percent of doctors requring (or at least, appearing to require) pelvic exams before precribing HBC is actually much higher than above. What I don't understand is, where's the outrage? Why do I feel like I'm the only one furious about the unnessary hurdles placed on people seeking birth control? It has eroded what little trust I ever had for the medical profession (since more health care providers really ought to be speaking out against it) and made me feel as if I have to be adversarial and hyper-viligant any time I need any sort of health care.