Misoprostol Question
Jul. 29th, 2010 02:20 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I'm scheduled to get Essure tomorrow. Originally, the procedure was scheduled for 9:30am. I got a call this morning pushing it back to 3:30pm.
Which brings me to my question: I have 2 doses of misoprostol I'm supposed to insert to soften my cervix -- one pill the night before and one "1 upon waking in the morning, or 2 to 4 hours prior" to the procedure. Made perfect sense when the procedure was in the morning, but now "upon waking" and "2 to 4 hours prior" are not exactly the same thing.
I've already called my doctor and am waiting to hear back from the office. I've also spoken with my pharmacist, who was unfamiliar with this specific situation and, considering that the prescribing instructions were now ambiguous, referred me back to my doctor.
Which brings me to my question: I have 2 doses of misoprostol I'm supposed to insert to soften my cervix -- one pill the night before and one "1 upon waking in the morning, or 2 to 4 hours prior" to the procedure. Made perfect sense when the procedure was in the morning, but now "upon waking" and "2 to 4 hours prior" are not exactly the same thing.
- Does the specific time even matter that much?
- If so, when should I take it?
I've already called my doctor and am waiting to hear back from the office. I've also spoken with my pharmacist, who was unfamiliar with this specific situation and, considering that the prescribing instructions were now ambiguous, referred me back to my doctor.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 09:32 pm (UTC)I don't know how fast chemically 'softened' cervices return to normal in non-childbirth situations, but I do know that cervical ripening agents that are used for inducing labour can take quite a while to work, and that postpartum cervixes take weeks, not hours to return to a harder, totally closed state. Based on that, it'd make sense -- to me, anyway -- to take the misoprostol earlier rather than later to give it a proper chance of working.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 09:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:05 pm (UTC)1) Procedure is now at noon tomorrow. (Blame the anesthesiologist, not the gyno.)
2) Second pill no more than 6 hours prior to the procedure.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:11 pm (UTC)And yeah, seems right. Don't want it to wear off or anything crazy like that.
I'll be thinkin' of your fallopian tubes tomorrow!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 11:00 pm (UTC)Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 03:30 am (UTC)Oh yeah, I love how they say you get so many sick days, then leave you with crappy subs, if you get one at all.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 05:10 am (UTC)Of those, I find only the last option really off-putting. Though apparently, the Essure info (http://www.essuremd.com/Portals/essuremd/PDFs/L3002%2009_09_09%20smaller.pdf) just says, "Consequently, if using RF energy to perform endometrial ablation, direct contact with the Essure micro-inserts should be avoided." (My doc is comfortable performing NovaSure after Essure, though she has reservations that NovaSure will be less effective because of her placement of the device.) That said, my uterine anatomy makes me contraindicated for NovaSure, so it's likely not our ablation option of choice. We're keeping it on the list, though, as my doc has the equipment in-office, which would make a significant time/financial difference for me.
ThermaChoice, which is one balloon ablation method (though I do not know if there are others), is explicitly okay to be performed after Essure. From the same Essure info:
Of all the ablation methods, it looks like only microwave ablation is an absolute no go. And I'm not totally sure how common microwave ablation is; none of the local providers I've spoken to have performed such a procedure.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-29 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-30 12:52 am (UTC)