male birth control pill?
Oct. 14th, 2007 06:20 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hey everyone!
Little question on behalf of my friends :)
Is there such a thing as the male pill that is currently available? This will be her first time being sexually active and she doesn't really know too much about birth control or well, the act itself, so I'm doing my good friend bit and trying to be as informative as possible. She asked me about female bc...and well, given how badly I react to it...I think I scared her a bit...so her bf being the good kind soul that he is has said "welp, if there is a I can take..."
So *is* there a male pill available? If so how much and from where? He is in the US...so I can't find any info for him, what with me being in the UK and her being in Iran...long story, very interesting, some other time :)
TIA
Little question on behalf of my friends :)
Is there such a thing as the male pill that is currently available? This will be her first time being sexually active and she doesn't really know too much about birth control or well, the act itself, so I'm doing my good friend bit and trying to be as informative as possible. She asked me about female bc...and well, given how badly I react to it...I think I scared her a bit...so her bf being the good kind soul that he is has said "welp, if there is a I can take..."
So *is* there a male pill available? If so how much and from where? He is in the US...so I can't find any info for him, what with me being in the UK and her being in Iran...long story, very interesting, some other time :)
TIA
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 05:27 pm (UTC)http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3543478/
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 05:52 pm (UTC)malecontraceptives.org
newmalecontraception.org
That's really good of him that he would consider it, because a lot of guys are "No way, Jose!" types. Which is really insensitive of them to place all of the responsibility and potential side effects on us. Like it's a "woman's job" to have to take the birth control in a relationship.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:17 pm (UTC)Thanks for the links.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 06:15 pm (UTC)I would give her the link to this website (if she has Internet access), since it sounds from your post like she has more questions than just about birth control, and this might be able to answer them for her :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 06:49 pm (UTC)It'll still be awhile before it is finished and released, but at any rate there will probably be a male birth control pill someday.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:08 pm (UTC)BUT I doubt that it should be that much harder to develop a male birth control pill than a female one. I think the main difference is that the side effects are taking more seriously when men are involved and the pill therefore takes a lot longer time in the making :(
I doubt that a male birth control pill that have as many (seriuos) side effects that the female has will ever hit the market.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 07:47 pm (UTC)The primary reason it would be more challenging to develop a male oral contraceptive is that the most obvious way of stopping sperm production is inhibiting production or delivery of testosterone.
Look at it this way: because female hormones naturally fluctuate throughout the cycle, including maintaining a natural and healthy specific level related to non-fertility, it's relatively easy to develop a female pill: simply manipulate the hormones to mimic the natural, non-fertile, post-ovulatory phase of the cycle.
This can be done without completely disrupting female physiology, since the body already has its own infertile phase built in.
But for males, the clear way to stop sperm production is to inhibit testosterone production or delivery.
The problem, of course, is that the male body isn't designed for a period of non-sperm-production that can simply be maintained through artificial hormones.
So if you stop testosterone, or inhibit it, you often produce breast growth, erectile dysfunction, and insulin defiency, among a host of other things.
I can certainly see why a pill that led to men developing breasts and being unable to achieve erection would be undesirable for both men and women, in addition to its other effects... and the ED would sort of negate the purpose of having the pill.
So what do they do? Well, one method mentioned in that article was a trial for a method that did inhibit testosterone, so men were simultaneously put on hormone replacement therapy.
While the contraceptive effects still work, requiring male users to take HRT while taking the contraceptive certainly eliminates a pretty huge portion of why the pill is so attractive: convenience and "one-stop contraceptive shopping," so to speak.
So the tricky part with the male pill is finding a way of stopping sperm production without compromising testosterone levels or requiring additional treatments to maintain them. That's a balance that's harder to work out in men than women.
Realistically, the side-effects posed by the female pill, including the rare serious ones, aren't terribly bad compared to many long-term medications on the market, including ones marketed for both genders, so I don't know if I agree with that suspicion.
Part of the reason I disagree is that pill manufacturers are still trying to find a female pill that doesn't produce as many side-effects.
The single main reason women stop taking HBC... in other words, the single biggest loss of revenue for contraceptive manufacturers... is because of the side-effects or the fear of the rare serious side-effects.
Based on profit motives alone, it would make sense that if methods of female contraception that posted fewer side effects were out there, companies would be all over them.
And indeed, the push to lower and lower estrogen doses (including today's super-low 15mcg EE pills) indicates that they are actively looking for a pill with fewer side effects.
Thank you!
Date: 2007-10-15 06:26 pm (UTC)I have actually heard about the study where men were put on hormone replacement therapy. I hope they can find a better way, so that we will see that pill soon (like this weekend would be great ;)
I also explained that the reasons for my skepticism were more political/emotional than based on facts. I don't want to take hormones myself, and I have had (and still have) a hard time to get midwives/other health care professionals to respect that (I live in Sweden, maybe things are different in the US). Basically they just stare at me like I am some kind of stupid little girl that doesn't understand what is best for her (and then I get a long explanation about WHY HBC is right for me, and my concerns are just being sneered at).
And of course I am damn tired that after all these years protection is still mainly seen as my responsibility when we are two people having sex.
Re: Thank you!
Date: 2007-10-15 06:45 pm (UTC)Believe me, I hear you there -- I also try to avoid hormonal contraceptives whenever I can (with my current partner, it's necessary for the time being, but hopefully not for long).
And I also think it's ridiculous the way it's often impressed on people as a "necessary" choice -- HBC really is a great choice for many women, but for many of us it simply isn't, and in the past I've certainly resented having to offer justifications for why I dislike it. I mean, I do have those justifications, but a simple "I don't like it" should be sufficient.
One thing I've experienced with any of my partners is that as soon as the topic of a male contraceptive pill comes up, they have without exception stated that they'd line up for a prescription the day it came out.
They know HBC is not great for my body, they know it makes me uncomfortable, and they feel helpless and frustrated that there's not much they can currently do that offers the same reliability and spontanaeity of HBC.
My preferred method is withdrawal, but my current partner is not experienced with it yet, so we're working on that.
So the plus side is -- as soon as such a pill exists, I won't have to worry about it being my responsibility anymore. :) And i think that will be the case for many women.
Amazingly enough, for once this isn't the patriarchy trying to piss on us
Date: 2007-10-14 09:53 pm (UTC)That is why men who take steroids often get ED, breast growth, emotional jaggs, etc. The whole balance of how their hormones were supposed to work got mucked with.
It's harder to influence male hormones to stop spermatogenesis (or get it going again, a very studied topic in animal fertility circles!) without getting some seriously unpleasant side effects.
See post by queensugar about female hormone interaction, and why it has been SO much easier to have a female HBC, she's dead on with that one.
Ugh, I tried googling male hormone cycle, spermatogenesis, etc on google with a bunch of crummy results. Try it yourself, perhaps you'll find something other than science journals or wikipedia. Anyways, I spent enough time in animal fertility classes to know that, at least in this regard, it isn't a matter of "you're the woman, the consequences are yours, so it's your problem!", it really is a physical constraint.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 09:16 pm (UTC)...one day!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-15 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 09:43 pm (UTC)