https://meekly.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] meekly.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] vaginapagina2005-09-05 03:28 pm

hey all..

I'm a long time reader and commenter... But I've never posted but something I just saw sparked a question over here.. The tattoo of the uterus and vagina got me to thinking... I plan to have children in the future and I'm considering getting a tattoo on my stomach.. kinda to the side and low (think right part of the tummy) and I heard that it could cause problems with my uterus and possibly making it impossible to have children. I don't know if its a myth sparked by ignorant people but I was wondering if any body has anything to add or erase from that...

Ohh. and to the mothers who read this and have tattoos on their stomachs, how did the stretch marks and tattoo work out for you??

[identity profile] ex-leopardp.livejournal.com 2005-09-05 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
There are still people who believe that if you have a tattoo on your back that you can't get an epidural! Which is ANOTHER pile of horsecrap. Same with mammograms. It doesn't block anything. It doesn't bleed into other areas...it doesn't destroy organs.

viellen: (tattoos)

[personal profile] viellen 2005-09-05 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, I hadn't heard that one before. I mean it really is ridiculous to make up these completely unscientific claims. I can understand if one doesn't want to get a tattoo due to religious implications (since we really can't prove whether or not there is validity to that)...but to just decide that tattoo's poison internal organs? Geez, get an education.

[identity profile] oh-justwait.livejournal.com 2005-09-05 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
i so heard that! cause i have a fairly large tattoo on top of my spine on my lower back, and someone was like "OH GOD I HOPE YOU DONT GET PREGGERS CAUSE YOU CANT HAVE AN EPIDURAL".
i figured it was horseshit, but i'm glad to know for sure that it is now.

[identity profile] just-tonight.livejournal.com 2005-09-05 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
a large part of my lower back is tattooed, had an epidural with no problems. :)

[identity profile] ex-leopardp.livejournal.com 2005-09-05 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yeah. They're full of it. It doesn't do a goddamned thing but react just like regular skin.

[identity profile] potionsmistress.livejournal.com 2005-09-06 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
My favorite is that you can't get an MRI when you've had ink done because OMG it will BURN YOUR SKIN. Um, yeah...I've got several tats and not one of them gave me any problems during either MRI.
I hate body mod related urban legends - they just ruin it for the rest of us.

[identity profile] s0yl3ntgr33n.livejournal.com 2005-09-06 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
they tested that one on Mythbusters and i guess there could have been a slight reason why the myth existed (tattoo ink used to contain trace amounts of iron or something) but it was definitely busted. they tried all types of ink.

[identity profile] ainadal.livejournal.com 2005-09-06 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
ha, my DOCTOR tried to tell me that when she saw my tattoo. i mean, shouldn't a doctor know better?!

[identity profile] jenbys.livejournal.com 2005-09-06 03:55 pm (UTC)(link)
See I thought that was true, because when I had surgery last year my surgeon actually told me that....sigh, this is why people remain ignorant- because people in a position of power perpetuate stupidity.