http://skeas.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] skeas.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] vaginapagina2008-01-12 05:41 pm
Entry tags:

Herpes disclosure

The recent post about herpes brought up some questions for me.

My question is: Is it always necessary for an infected person to tell a potential partner?

From a theoretical standpoint, YES! Yes, yes, yes! But consider a few scenarios:

You haven't had an outbreak since your first one--15 years ago. As most of us know, herpes is transmittable even when the infected person doesn't have a sore. However, plenty of us infected people just avoid sex/kissing when we have a sore, and the other partner is fine. Do you still let your partner know about an outbreak you had at 20, when you are now 35? Do you risk ruining the whole relationship (because people generally freak out when the word "herpes" in involved) over a nearly negligible risk?

You have oral herpes. Studies show that 80% of us have herpes antibodies, and might be carriers of the disease without even knowing it. Yet I've never, ever heard of someone fessing up before a liplock. Do you let everyone you are about to kiss know that you have oral herpes? I personally feel like everyone is aware of--or should be aware of--a certain risk that's involved with intimate behavior like kissing or sex. You could catch mono, a cold, the flu, herpes, et cetera. You do what you can to prevent it, but it's still there.

For that matter, is there a difference between disclosing about oral herpes (which you can write off under the more innocuous name of cold sores) and genital herpes? Do you have more of a responsibility to tell a partner about genital herpes? And why?

[identity profile] suicidekitty911.livejournal.com 2008-01-13 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
you could also use an IUI or vaginal insemination to get pregnant.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] suicidekitty911.livejournal.com 2008-01-13 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
oh, i didn't mean YOU you, just a general you. I know some people are unwilling to go to those lengths - or not even know about them - but I was just throwing it out there.
I have fertility issues but I never thought I'd want to go so far as having IVF. It surprised me how quickly IFV was back on the table after the other methods have failed. I would LOVE to be able to have children 'the natural way' but we are lucky in that we can have all the unprotected sex we want without risk of an accidental pregnancy - and during a fertility treatment cycle, there are only a few days out of the cycle we have to abstain. So, with that in mind, i like to think we are still doing it the natural way, just with a little extra help. :)

Good luck with your genetics counseling. I think it is wonderful that we have that technology available to us. I hope everything turns out exactly as you want it to!

[identity profile] marionravenwood.livejournal.com 2008-01-13 09:01 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think herpes is a big deal at all, but there's actually a very small chance of transmitting herpes through semen, without skin contact: "....Acquisition of HSV-2 resulting from artificial insemination with sperm obtained from a man with asymptomatic primary HSV-2 infection has been documented. (http://www.stdjournal.com/pt/re/std/fulltext.00007435-199901000-00001.htm;jsessionid=HJRpJkqqYhLc6NDhy6Zh8HJ5R6gd4wfLvBr5n8LzFNr9gnvnLL41!-1829525682!181195628!8091!-1)

archangelbeth: An egyptian-inspired eye, centered between feathered wings. (Eye in the Pyrawings)

[personal profile] archangelbeth 2008-01-13 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Fascinating -- I wonder if there was a sore/spot-for-shedding-virus-bits in the urethra, and the semen got contaminated because of passing through the urethra?

...sorry. Just-Woke-Up Medical Curiosity is activated!

[identity profile] suicidekitty911.livejournal.com 2008-01-13 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
oh my. i was completely unaware of that. that's really interesting, thank you for sharing that!

*thinks*